Tuesday, October 31, 2017

NOAH'S ARK IS NOT A MYTH ACCORDING TO THE DICTIONARY DEFINITION OF THE WORD. There Is Scientific Evidence For Noah's Ark And For The Flood Even If The Ignorant Declare It A Myth. Too many people think every ancient story dealing with supernatural beings, ancestors, or heroes that serves as a fundamental type in the worldview of a people, as by explaining aspects of the natural world or delineating the psychology, customs, or ideals of society.

I would like to say that flood was an exercise in mythology, but the trouble with that view is NOAH'S ARK has been found 6300 ft above sea level. Besides this, there is too much evidence in the geological record that can only be explained by a worldwide flood.

When speaking with two Buddhists celebrating Chinese New Year, they were telling me how rubbing the Buddha’s tummy brings good luck. One was a Buddhist who had been born in Hong Kong. The other was a Buddhist who had been born in Indonesia. For them Chinese New Year is all about good luck at their favorite casino. Gambling with games of chance is not seen as immoral by governments seeking revenue, whereas some people believe the idea of coming into existence and living by chance is immoral.

There is the myth that man is a chemical and his thoughts will be found when the higgs boson is fully examined. This elusive element apparently permits people to be more creative when it comes to relative morality and situational ethics—something to do with strangelets (maybe?). What are the chances that a particle collider's strangelets will destroy the Earth?

There is the myth aliens exist, especially the one about those who came from the planet Nibiru that is propagated by all those who want to believe Zechariah Sitchin and swallow his mythology about the Anunnaki. Believers in aliens will believe anything, so the morality of these believers is whatever will be, will be, I suppose.

There are many beliefs that are myths and have no archaeological evidence to back them up. But when one genuinely seeks to discredit the historical record in the Bible or claim the Moses is a myth, one will personally visit the sites of Noah’s Ark in Turkey or Mt Jabal al lawz in Saudi Arabia. Otherwise not to do so and speak falsely about their non-existence is an act of immorality—not to mention an act of pure foolishness.

Myths Are Propaganda Made By People With The Intent To Deceive


Sunday, October 29, 2017

VIOLENCE VERSES NON-VIOLENCE AS A MEANS OF POLITICAL PERSUASION IS CONTRARY TO THE SPIRIT OF THIS WORLD. The World In Which We Live Is Controlled By The Violent One Who Expresses Violence Against Those Who Seek Peace. Peace is not merely not being non-wilent but transcends this temporal world in which we live and is only possible if we know the Creator personally.

Individuals inclined towards totalitarianism, oppression and bullying in general, unless they have had a sharpened conscience for some other reason, have no compunction about torturing or beheading people. The tend to find morbidity a thrill. So why would they not take advantage of the non-violent, whom they would consider to be weak and easy prey.

Mahatma Gandhi practiced non-violence and got shot. That was the end of his life.

Once I read a book where the writer claimed that Mahatma Gandhi attended a Keswick Convention in London. After listening to the speaker, Mahatma Gandhi had to muster all the strength he could to resist the call to go to the front of the meeting hall and acknowledge Jesus Christ as Lord before those in attendance. After that experience Gandhi found it easier to resist the call to come to the resurrected Lord Jesus Christ. This, even though, he admired the teachings of Lord Jesus.

Of course, the difference between Mahatma Gandhi and Jesus of Nazareth is that one of them rose from the dead. The Son of God rose from the dead and his grave is nowhere to be found. As it happens, Mahatma Gandhi also is buried nowhere to be found. In Gandhi’s case, he was cremated instead of being buried and instead of returning to dust, he returned to ashes. Sixty-two years after his death, some of those ashes were scattered off the South African coast. (Gandhi's ashes scattered off South African coast... 62 years after his death)

Jesus of Nazareth was easy prey. He did not run away. When Pilate declared his power, Jesus let him do what he liked. A murderer was released for the Jews in place of the man in whom there was found no sin.
Now at the feast the governor was accustomed to release for the crowd any one prisoner whom they wanted. And they had then a notorious prisoner, called Barabbas. So when they had gathered, Pilate said to them, “Whom do you want me to release for you, Barabbas or Jesus who is called Christ?” For he knew that it was out of envy that they had delivered him up. Besides, while he was sitting on the judgment seat, his wife sent word to him, “Have nothing to do with that righteous man, for I have suffered much over him today in a dream.” Now the chief priests and the elders persuaded the people to ask for Barabbas and destroy Jesus. The governor again said to them, “Which of the two do you want me to release for you?” And they said, “Barabbas.” Pilate said to them, “Then what shall I do with Jesus who is called Christ?” They all said, “Let him be crucified.” And he said, “Why, what evil has he done?” But they shouted all the more, “Let him be crucified.”
So when Pilate saw that he was gaining nothing, but rather that a riot was beginning, he took water and washed his hands before the crowd, saying, “I am innocent of this man’s blood; see to it yourselves.” And all the people answered, “His blood be on us and on our children!” Then he released for them Barabbas, and having scourged Jesus, delivered him to be crucified. (Matthew 27:15-26)
Those who possess a hardened heart, even though they know murder is contrary to the will of God, care not. They will kill, plunder and destroy; then justify their actions as being ordained of the Creator God Almighty. Self-righteous people still exult in doing evil to the Lord of Creation and His disciples; yet all He wants to do is bring peace and goodwill to all men.
  • And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God, and saying, Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men. (Luke 2:13-14)
Those who delight in oppressing others are not affected by their conscience, unless they are like Saul of Tarsus.
  • And when we had all fallen to the ground, I heard a voice saying to me in the Hebrew language, ‘Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me? It hurts you to kick against the goads.’ (Acts 26:14)
Saul of Tarsus, later to become the Apostle Paul, was having issues with his conscience as he breathed threats of murder and signed the death warrants of those who were spreading the message of peace and good will among men. Paul’s conscience had been sharpened before he went on his murderous campaign, this is why he was being pricked from within his conscience. On the other side of the coin, a deadened conscience will be deader still, after kicking in a few heads and sending some people into the land of vegetation.

An Enlightened Conscience Is Light Years Ahead When It Comes To Moral Darkness

ATHEISTS RULE ON FORUMS AND DERIDE THOSE WHO POINT TO THE CREATOR AS BEING IMBECILES WHO CANNOT BOAST OF AN IQ. What These Atheists Extol As An Intelligence Quotient To Be Proud About Is Really A Demonstration Of Their Ignorance. Since an IQ of 200 might be considered high intelligence, when compared with the Omniscient Creator this is really the possession of an Ignorant Quotient that is nothing to boast about really, because 200 compared to infinity is very small indeed.

Contrary to your assertion that atheists are dehumanized on Quora is the fact that they ridicule, and scoff at, the idea of a Creator and consider those who can produce archaeological evidence that verifies Noah’s Ark, the Flood of Genesis, the Israelite deliverance from Egypt and other evidences as rubbish.

Atheists do not accept the existence of the Creator. They believe that there is no Creator of the Universe to whom respect is due, rather they have their own beliefs that they consider are superior to what appear to be the logical truth: people are born to suffer and die and have been given the ability to reason out why? (Isaiah 1:18)

Seriously, to boast about how intelligent and how superior one is than the Creator God because you believe that everything came about by chance is futility at its best, like a dog chasing its tail really: death comes around before the tail is caught.

Being human is not difficult to define. The difference between a human and an irrational creature, according to the Bible, is the ability to reason with the faculty given for that purpose, which men and woman possess. The book of Isaiah instructs that God calls on every human being to come and reason with Him. Now that is not dehumanizing anybody. If an atheist claims that it is impossible to reason with God, then this is that person’s belief.
However, when it comes to morality, most people do not understand it—they see morality as rules, when in fact it is about relationship: people with people and people with their Creator.

Too many people think that possessing the ability to contemplate matters within a certain field of endeavor is the ultimate in intelligence, rather than acknowledging that unless one has the power over death, life as a human being is futile.

There are two simple statements provided by Jesus of Nazareth that really sum up the lot of all who think they are smarter and more intelligent than the Almighty Creator of the Universe, or like to take pride in their longevity as an atheist, and seek to escape reality by talking about millions and billions of years, while they themselves are unlikely to live 100 years in this pitiful existence.
  • He said to him, ‘If they do not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they be convinced if some one should rise from the dead.’” (Luke 16:31)
  • You [read] the scriptures …. it is they that bear witness to me; yet you refuse to come to me that you may have life. I do not receive glory from men. But I know that you have not the love of God within you. I have come in my Father’s name, and you do not receive me; if another comes in his own name, him you will receive. How can you believe, who receive glory from one another and do not seek the glory that comes from the only God? Do not think that I shall accuse you to the Father; it is Moses who accuses you, on whom you set your hope. If you believed Moses, you would believe me, for he wrote of me. But if you do not believe his writings, how will you believe my words?” (John 5:39-47)
Why acknowledge that the Creator exists when you can create your own solitary universe; one where you can live for eternity all alone. Each one makes his or her own choice. There is nothing dehumanizing about being given a right to accept or reject your only hope of eternal life. Nothing dehumanizing about absolute morality either.

Situational Ethics Is Better Than Absolutes Because I Can Do What I Like But!

Saturday, October 28, 2017

DEMON POSSESSION IS CONSIDERED NONSENSE BY THOSE WHO THINK THEY ARE SCIENTIFICALLY ENLIGHTENED AND BELIEVE THAT PSYCHOTIC ILLNESSES ARE THE RESULT OF SOME BRAIN MALFUNCTION. The Bible Distinguishes Between The Spiritual And The Physical, And Even Allows For The Psychological. However, even psychological issues are really the result of spiritual influences that are evil, as is demonstrated when Jesus casts out demons.

Luke 8:26-39 is quite explicit. A deranged man is demon possessed. Jesus identifies that this is the case and demonstrates His authority over the evil ones. The demons seek to be cast into swine rather than the abyss. Once in the swine, they drove the swine to the drink. What a waste of life? Or pigs?

The moral to the story: do not let demons into swine, they are driven to the brink (“Drink!” said the alcoholic, “I’ll have one of those.”)
  • Jesus then asked him, “What is your name?” And he said, “Legion”; for many demons had entered him. And they begged him not to command them to depart into the abyss. Now a large herd of swine was feeding there on the hillside; and they begged him to let them enter these. So he gave them leave. Then the demons came out of the man and entered the swine, and the herd rushed down the steep bank into the lake and were drowned. When the herdsmen saw what had happened, they fled, and told it in the city and in the country. Then people went out to see what had happened, and they came to Jesus, and found the man from whom the demons had gone, sitting at the feet of Jesus, clothed and in his right mind; and they were afraid. (Luke 8:30-35)
Israelites were not to eat swine. Evidently, this is more a health benefit rather than an effectual rite for salvation, even if it were a command given within what some people consider a religious context, because of the judgment of God associated with disobedience, having violated this health law.

Consider this question: In jurisdictions where there are health regulations for the preparation and selling of food, are people jailed today for violation of health laws, if they cannot pay the fine?

Therefore, the health laws existed for the physical good of the people, not for their eternal salvation, even if presented within a theocratic religious context.

  • “Those who sanctify and purify themselves to go into the gardens, following one in the midst, eating swine’s flesh and the abomination and mice, shall come to an end together,” says the Lord. (Isaiah 66:17)
One of the biggest concerns with eating pork meat is trichinosis or trichinellosis. This is an infection that humans get from eating undercooked or uncooked pork that contains the larvae of the trichinella worm. In some countries and cultures, they actually consume pork raw.—Tapeworms, Toxins and More: The Truth about Your Pork
The episode of this demoniac, recorded in Luke, tells us that if you think you are smart (possess an IQ of note) and have answers to life’s question but do not know the One who has the power over life and death, like those who saw the man delivered from his demons, you too ought to be afraid. Demons are intent on one thing only, taking you to the brink—of the abyss. Why let them take control of your life? ( 2 Timothy 2:26; Ephesians 2:2) Especially, when you can be free from fear of death’s unknown.

The Wise Seek The Truth But Those Who Scoff Shall Have No One To Defend Them

Friday, October 27, 2017

THE WORST THING ABOUT BEING HUMAN IS POSSESSING A CONSCIENCE, BECAUSE THIS REMINDS US, PAINFULLY AT TIMES, THAT WE ARE WRONGDOERS. The Answer To Ridding Oneself Of A Problematic Conscience Is To Cut It Out Or Deaden It Or Heal It. After all, a conscience is merely the inner recognition between right and wrong and need not be bothersome if we can deaden it.

Congenital analgesia is a condition where children are unable to feel pain when they have hurt themselves or if anybody else physically hurts them. The dangers of congenital analgesia is told in Steve Pete’s story: Congenital analgesia: The agony of feeling no pain—BBC News.

As a baby, when Steve began teething, he was able chew a considerable portion of his tongue before his parents had noticed that he was eating himself. Self-preservation against self-cannibalism is one of the reasons why experiencing physical pain is to each one’s advantage.

Our conscience is capable of pricking our internal faculty that records pain at the spiritual level of our existence. The spiritual level of existence is where our thoughts are produced. Thoughts are produced as words; but as sounds they are not seen when voiced. Yet when people say something that is derogatory, which is insulting or belittling to us, we can experience pain, even though we do not see the words—merely hear them.

Our conscience is the internal faculty that enables us to possess knowledge and discern right from wrong, good from evil, truth from falsehood. Essentially, without a conscience—which means joint-knowledge (HELPS Word-studies conscience)—we are not capable of thinking, because thinking requires us to distinguish between two things and possess knowledge of the differences.

If we were not able to feel pain as a consequence of our thoughts, we would not appreciate the difference between right and wrong, good and evil, falsehood and the truth.

If we have a deadened conscience, this is analogous to suffering from congenital analgesia, where one can be eaten up by moral violations, corrupt to the core, without realizing that death—a lonely eternal existence void of peace, joy and love—is consuming oneself until it is too late.

Unlike the temporary physical realm that can be seen, the unseen realm does not come to an end. Cessation of physical life for humans is not the cessation of existence; for our spirit—from where our thoughts arise and where our conscience exists—and our soul continues (compare: Luke 12:4-5).

A conscience that is alive enables us to recognize violations of righteousness and rectify our own infringements of other people’s rights. Those who have seared their conscience have lost this ability. Therefore, they will violate the rights of other people. This includes insulting their parents, who gave them birth, and the Eternal One, who created humans in His own image, in the hope that they might seek to enjoy their relationship with Him and each other.

Instead of seeing people seeking the righteousness of true love or the truth that upholds justice, we find the realm of men bedeviled by corruption, hatred, warmongering and all kinds of evil that are violations of the Ten Commandments handed down by God to remind us what it means to have a conscience.

A Sharp Conscience Enables You To Be Honest So You Can Enjoy And Possess Life

Wednesday, October 25, 2017

SINS OF ISRAEL AND JUDAH AS NATIONS WERE COMPOUNDED AND PENANCE WAS HANDED DOWN UNTIL THE REINSTITUTION OF MODERN DAY NATION. What Each One Does Is A Personal Matter And To Be A Part Of The True People Of God Is To Belong To The Vine. The true israel as opposed to the temporal one according to genes.

Happy Riches
Happy Riches answers request by Jamar Grimsley

My immediate impression is that this text could be relevant for the present time as we approach the Second Advent of Lord Jesus Christ.

Jerusalem was destroyed in 70 AD but has since been rebuilt. Particular note is taken of the fact that the rebuilding of Jerusalem is taking place now as part of modern day (Judea) Israel. After all, Isaiah was speaking to the Judahites—otherwise known as Jews. In fact, there is a prophecy in Ezekiel, using symbolism, which foretells that the sins of the people of Israel would be accounted for over time and the land would be once more restored. The sins of Israel and Judah as nations were compounded and penance was handed down—expulsion from the land.

In saying that the sins of Israel and Judah were dealt with by means of a sentence—wherein descendants of Jacob would be destroyed and driven from the land or city of Jerusalem—this has nothing to do with retribution required for individual sins and atonement only being available through the blood of the Son of God. This has to do with the state of Israel as a nation created by God and the promise that was given to Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and the Israelites that came out of Egypt.

Many people are unable to distinguish between the Old Testament reference to the nation of God among the nations of men and New Testament introduction to the Kingdom of God that dwells within the hearts of those who acknowledge their need for eternal life.

The words to which you refer in Isaiah are below:
Comfort, comfort my people,
says your God.
Speak tenderly to Jerusalem,
and cry to her
that her warfare is ended,
that her iniquity is pardoned,
that she has received from the Lord’s hand
double for all her sins.
A voice cries:
“In the wilderness prepare the way of the Lord,
Make straight in the desert a highway for our God.
Every valley shall be lifted up,
and every mountain and hill be made low;
the uneven ground shall become level,
and the rough places a plain.
And the glory of the Lord shall be revealed,
and all flesh shall see it together,
for the mouth of the Lord has spoken.”
(Isaiah 40:1-5)
An exposition of the above is beyond the limits of this response; so in stating the obvious, we are definitely looking at an apocalyptic end, when justice shall be meted out and every one shall be standing at the same level before the Judge of all the Earth.

John the Baptist came crying like one in the wilderness, as he announced the coming of the Word made flesh (John 1:14), who was to usher in the Kingdom of God.
“Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.” For this is he who was spoken of by the prophet Isaiah when he said, “The voice of one crying in the wilderness: Prepare the way of the Lord,make his paths straight.”
Now John wore a garment of camel’s hair, and a leather girdle around his waist; and his food was locusts and wild honey. Then went out to him Jerusalem and all Judea and all the region about the Jordan, and they were baptized by him in the river Jordan, confessing their sins.
But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming for baptism, he said to them, “You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come? 8 Bear fruit that befits repentance, and do not presume to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father’; for I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children to Abraham. Even now the axe is laid to the root of the trees; every tree therefore that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.
“I baptize you with water for repentance, but he who is coming after me is mightier than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry; he will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire. His winnowing fork is in his hand, and he will clear his threshing floor and gather his wheat into the granary, but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire.”
(Matthew 3:2-12)
Since that time, the Kingdom of God has been growing in the hearts of many and we are approaching the fulfillment of what is spoken in Isaiah 40:1-5, rather than its beginning (Matthew 3:2-12). The Apostle Paul was clear about this:
Lest you be wise in your own conceits, I want you to understand this mystery, brethren: a hardening has come upon part of Israel, until the full number of the Gentiles come in, and so all Israel will be saved; as it is written,
“The Deliverer will come from Zion,
he will banish ungodliness from Jacob”;
“and this will be my covenant with them
when I take away their sins.”
As regards the gospel they are enemies of God, for your sake; but as regards election they are beloved for the sake of their forefathers.
(Romans 11:25-28)
The nation of Israel was elected to be exalted among the nations of the Earth; not the various individuals themselves. Because of this, the individuals who make up the nation Israel could be as evil as they like—each one will be judged individually according to their works (Ezekiel 18:23-32). Therefore, the nation as a corporate body (like a corporation) exists but the people belonging to it can come and go, and this does not affect the election of the nation. What each one does is a personal matter and to be a part of the true people of God—the true Israel as opposed to the temporal one according to genes—is to belong to the Vine (John 15:1-6).

Events point to the return of Lord Jesus Christ, where the prophecies in Isaiah and Romans will be fulfilled. Now is the time to repent and get ready; lest you be found wanting and miss out on being raised to meet the Lord, on that Day when He appears again.
  • And just as it is appointed for men to die once, and after that comes judgment, so Christ, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to deal with sin but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him. (Hebrews 9:27-28)
The text from Isaiah 40:1-5 can be used devotionally and applied to oneself, even spiritualized; for God is the same today, yesterday and tomorrow, and it is not flesh and blood that blinds the minds of unbelievers or contends against those who seek the truth (Ephesians 6.11–12). Regardless of who we are, or where we are, we all exist within the Universe that was created within the Omnipresent One (Acts 17:28). The Lord wants to comfort those who mourn (Matthew 5:4) or who are afflicted (2 Corinthians 1:6; 2 Thessalonians 1:7). Know this, “he will not break a bruised reed or quench a smoldering wick, till he brings justice to victory” (Matthew 12:20). Therefore heed the clarion call and make straight the paths of the Lord.

Be Wise: Make Straight The Ways Of The Lord Before That Great And Terrible Day

THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL IS POSTULATED AS BEING AN IDEA RATHER THAN THE LOVE OF MONEY, BUT COULD THIS REALLY BE TRUE? The Reality Of Desiring Money (Riches, Wealth) Is Overpowering For Those Who Became Futile In Their Thinking; For They Forget Death Reigns Over All, Not The Means By Which Status Is Measured. Yet there is the possibility that the idea of being something other than what one is consumes an individual and this drives the person to an insane position of wanting to challenge God the Creator; who alone is the Judge of all, and has the final say over who shall possess life or death.

Happy Riches

Happy Riches Answer requested by Diane Shatto

Gnosticism is a state of mind that rejects the objective truth about God and revels in the delights of the virtual reality of human creativity. In centuries past, Gnosticism was a form of humanism that exulted in the self and yet delighted in the ideas expressed within the Gospels. Gnostics called themselves Christians, even though they denied Lord Jesus Christ. From what is written in Theopedia, Gnosticism seems very much like Buddhism with a Christian cloak. Nothing much has changed. Nevertheless, Gnosticism has many forms and expressions and has not disappeared. To quote Theopedia:
This heretical view is still in existence today, both in various secretive cults and in such pop religious movements as astrology or alchemy.
The Masonic movement has been referred to as a Gnostic movement. The popular book _The Da Vinci Code_ (2003, Doubleday) by Dan Brown promotes Gnostic ideas as it attempts to undermine orthodox Christianity. —Gnosticism | Theopedia
Postmodernism appears to be merely a form of cultural relativity that is not so much rooted in Gnosticism per se but the humanism that has pervaded the campuses of the (deceived) cultural elite who think that there is meaning in human abstraction, within which they believe there is much yet to be found, for it can only be perceived intuitively rather than analyzed with the determined objectivity of a scientist seeking the exactitude of reduplication.

The postmodernist seeks not denouement, rather esoteric explanations that permit greater mystery, as each individual discovers and nurtures personal subjective realities about existence that celebrate diversity. The mere fact that snowflakes are distinctive by their uniqueness, can be objectively categorized, and yet look the same when together, is rejected by the postmodernist; for this idea of individuality expressed but becoming the same is superficially abhorred—but that is the Buddhist reality they all long for, the absence of individuality and therefore any acknowledgement of accountability.

Being in denial, postmodernists resemble precious snowflakes, only ones that squirm when feeling victimized, not so much by actuality but in pretense of the virtual: an outrageous idea, an incorrect expression, a potential insult. Such phenomena could be catastrophic and irreversible if the thought bubble is burst. Never mind people are being mutilated, beheaded and sold into slavery. Let’s face it, to the postmodernist such things do not exist. The world of the ideal expressed by sympathetic individuals striving to divorce themselves from reality is the nirvana of the postmodernist.

There is division among the academic elite when it comes to what worldview to accept. At its root is atheism, the rejection of God and exaltation of humanism, which is not exactly the Gnosticism of the second century AD. Still the humanist sentiment is resident. Humans have the answers—except for how to overcome death and not violate The Only Words Written By The Finger Of God at any point.

The scientific community cannot quite accommodate the humanities because, unlike the humanities, the former requires concrete results and therefore is still constrained by modernism, even if postmodern theories are stock-in-trade when it comes to promoting propaganda. The academe sphere of the humanities has no such restraint.—Postmodern Philosophy

Rejection of the truth and seriously reflecting upon one’s ultimate fate and lack of reason are at the root of postmodernism. Gnosticism is merely a manifestation of this—whatever form it takes.


Objective Reality Has Its Subjective Element When Acknowledged As The Truth

Tuesday, October 24, 2017

THE PLANET NIBIRU IS ABOUT TO APPEAR AND THE ALIENS THAT PREVIOUSLY LIVED THERE, WHO ARE ON EARTH NOW, ARE PREPARING FOR A MASSIVE BATTLE. The Good Aliens Verses Evil Aliens Showdown Is Expected To Produce Star Wars In The Sky But Nobody Has Been Notified Of The Program Yet Or Whether This Will Be Able To Be Seen From Antarctica, The Equator Or The Arctic Circle. If this were to really happen, the end of the world as we know it would be on the cards.

Zechariah Sitchen's Ancient Alien Theory attributes the beginnings of society to the Annunaki, who traveled from the planet Nibiru.

The planet Nibiru is supposedly where the aliens live that are coming to take over the Earth, while some left eons ago and are living (and you believe it)  underground on this planet, even at Antarctica.

If you haven't heard about it yet, there is a war going on between the goodies and the baddies and this is being played out here on Earth right now. 

Evil aliens from outer space already living on Earth have control of the world's ruling elite. 

These are the Lizard People who control the thirteenth tribe of Khazarians that rule this Earth.

According to all these people, who reject the Bible's account of the Son of God coming to Earth, supported by angels, to deliver people from captive to the Devil's influence, the Extra Terrestrials are fighting each other and the ETs that win the war are going to take over the planet.

The similarity in the Extra Terrestrial story about good and bad aliens and what the Bible refers to as the fallen angels headed by the Devil (Lucifer) and the angels that have remained with God is rather remarkable.

Those who want you to believe in Extra Terrestrials, all reject the Son of God came to Earth to die in the flesh to redeem what had been kidnapped, by paying the price for sin, and then being raised from the dead to demonstrate that He is God and has the power over death.

One radio host, who rejects the Bible and its historical evidence, believes we have been on Mars for 20-30 years–of which there is no genuine proof, unless you believe this train axle is really on Mars as our radio host does.

However, the radio host does not accept the historical artifacts confirming the truth of the Exodus, the reality of Noah's Ark, and other evidence recorded in the Bible; for if he did, they would be posted on his website.

Dr Joseph Chiappalone is a medical doctor, who believes that he has been given insight from aliens as to what is happening on the Earth and what is going to happen, such as:

" I am now telling you NO ONE WILL SURVIVE BEYOND AUGUST 2016!"

 Chiappalone has rejected that the Son of God came to Earth, died for his sin, and provided an inheritance for him, if he is willing to accept that he has sinned and the blood of Jesus has paid the price to secure his freedom from eternal punishment.

According to the report at the Warwick Daily News in 2011this doctor claims that he was taken to a ship and taught by aliens the information that he is passing on to others.

As for the aliens themselves, Dr Chiappalone said they can take the form of anything they choose.
“They can invade bodies. Some of them are good but a lot are not here for us – (some of them can be) very evil and don’t give two hoots about humans.”

When you understand the demons can enter people and influence them into thinking that they are visiting planets, as Hindu yogis and Buddhist holy men report, you can appreciate that Dr Chiappalone has been possessed by these beings and given experiences in his mind that he believes are real.

Demons are very real, but not only this, there are many different shapes and sizes of beings that are under the control of Satan (aka Lucifer, the Devil)I have seen the "them".

When people experiment with drugs, they can find themselves hallucinating and opening their minds up to being possessed by demons.

Dr ​Joseph Chiappalone​ ​ believes that the planet Nibiru will appear by the end of this year and the world is about to end. 

Well, I am saying that he is deceived, even possessed and needs deliverance from the power of the prince of the air that controls the minds of all who are disobedient to the truth. 

In fact, if Nibiru turns up at the end of this year, and there are aliens, I will throw the Bible away as a useless book.

If Nibiru does not turn up with aliens and you are reading this, and have doubts about the 66 books of the Bible, then at least you will know why I possess so much confidence in the book to be accurate.

According to the Warwick Daily News, Chiappalone claims that science and religion have no answers:

“People just can’t live with the dishonesty, exploitation and suffering and a lot of them have noticed they don’t fit into life and they want to know why. The answers given by religion and science just don’t make sense.”

Science has answers to some things but not when it comes to why we are born to suffer and die.

Religion comes in two forms:
1) that which objectively recognizes truth and 
2) that which is false and equivalent to witchcraft or any form of philosophy that turns people away from seeking the Creator.

The Warwick Daily News reported  in June of 2014:

A MEDICAL doctor who once claimed to have been abducted by aliens has been reprimanded for engaging in a sexual relationship with a patient.
Dr Joseph Chiappalone has also been banned from applying for medical registration for 12 months in a decision handed down by the Queensland Civil and Administration Tribunal.

True religion is about the quest for the truth of why we are here on Earth; why we are born, have to suffer, and then die.

Jesus said, "I am the Way, the truth and the Life, no comes to the Father except through Me." (John 14:6)

Jesus is saying that we have to be born from above so that we may come to understand the truth of how to overcome suffering and what it means to die and yet be made alive unto eternal life.

True religion does not require us to perform rituals to be saved or do anything to earn forgiveness, just repent, hate evil and exercise faith towards our Heavenly Father.


Sunday, October 22, 2017

PARABLES AND METAPHORS AND SYMBOLISM IN THE BIBLE PRESENTS PROBLEMS FOR MANY READERS SEEKING TO UNDERSTAND THE TRUTHS BURIED IN ITS PAGES. Like Precious Metals That Have To Be Dug Out Of The Ground, The Truths Of God Need To Be Unearthed From The Scriptures Inspired By The Holy. Not everybody understands that the spiritual is likened to the physical and the physical is but a reflection of the spiritual, which makes it difficult for those whose minds are blinded by the god of this world.

Happy Riches

Happy Riches Answers request by Vincent Han
The Bible is an interesting book. We who desire to know the truth read it. We become liberated as we begin to express faith in the Son of God. Those who are opposed to the gospel message read it and are judged by their inaction or rejection of the message of life eternal.

Are the two stories parables? Surely not both of them. Even if they were parables, it needs to noted that Jesus spoke in parables to hide the truths of His message. Why would Jesus want to hide the truth of His message? Because He was only seeking genuine hearers and not insincere people who are only after what they can obtain for their own personal gain, rather than seeking to understand the truth of life.

We know that Jesus attracted many people who only wanted to know Him for what they could obtain for themselves in this life. This is particularly evident in the Gospel of John, chapter six, where the book records Jesus had fed the five thousand and then spoke about the true bread, being Himself, that abides unto eternal life.
The Jews then disputed among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?” So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; he who eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me, and I in him. As the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so he who eats me will live because of me. This is the bread which came down from heaven, not such as the fathers ate and died; he who eats this bread will live for ever.” This he said in the synagogue, as he taught at Capernaum.
Many of his disciples, when they heard it, said, “This is a hard saying; who can listen to it?” But Jesus, knowing in himself that his disciples murmured at it, said to them, “Do you take offense at this? Then what if you were to see the Son of man ascending where he was before? It is the spirit that gives life, the flesh is of no avail; the words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life. But there are some of you that do not believe.” For Jesus knew from the first who those were that did not believe, and who it was that would betray him. And he said, “This is why I told you that no one can come to me unless it is granted him by the Father.”
After this many of his disciples drew back and no longer went about with him. (John 6:52–66)
Was Jesus speaking in a parable when He referred to His Himself as being the Bread of Life, and that people needed to eat His flesh and eat His blood? Maybe Jesus was using symbolism. Maybe this was an analogy. Whatever the truth maybe, one thing we know for sure, what Jesus said certainly sorted out those who were genuine seekers of truth from those who were looking for something else, for we read that many, who were said to be His disciples, ceased following Him—the first backsliders!

Clearly, in the book of John, Lazarus was a real person who had died.
Then Jesus told them plainly, “Lazarus is dead; and for your sake I am glad that I was not there, so that you may believe. But let us go to him.” (John 11:14–15)
We see in the same chapter of John that Jesus raised Lazarus from the dead so that the disciples, who had continued with Him, might believe that He is truly the Resurrection and the Life.
Then Jesus, deeply moved again, came to the tomb; it was a cave, and a stone lay upon it.
Jesus said, “Take away the stone.” Martha, the sister of the dead man, said to him, “Lord, by this time there will be an odor, for he has been dead four days.”
Jesus said to her, “Did I not tell you that if you would believe you would see the glory of God?”
So they took away the stone. And Jesus lifted up his eyes and said, “Father, I thank thee that thou hast heard me.
I knew that thou hearest me always, but I have said this on account of the people standing by, that they may believe that thou didst send me.”
When he had said this, he cried with a loud voice, “Lazarus, come out.”
The dead man came out, his hands and feet bound with bandages, and his face wrapped with a cloth. Jesus said to them, “Unbind him, and let him go.” (John 11:38–44)
The account in Luke, chapter sixteen, skeptics scoff at being a fairy tale (or is it a theory tale). Many people, who accept the veracity of the Bible, believe the account of Lazarus and the Rich Man (Dives) in the Gospel of Luke to be a parable. Another segment of the believing community claim that this is a real account of a beggar named Lazarus and the outcome of his happenstance. A third view is that this is a composite story of actual events that reveal an eternal truth; therefore, not a parable.
“There was a rich man, who was clothed in purple and fine linen and who feasted sumptuously every day. And at his gate lay a poor man named Lazarus, full of sores, who desired to be fed with what fell from the rich man’s table; moreover the dogs came and licked his sores. The poor man died and was carried by the angels to Abraham’s bosom. The rich man also died and was buried; and in Hades, being in torment, he lifted up his eyes, and saw Abraham far off and Lazarus in his bosom. And he called out, ‘Father Abraham, have mercy upon me, and send Lazarus to dip the end of his finger in water and cool my tongue; for I am in anguish in this flame.’
But Abraham said, ‘Son, remember that you in your lifetime received your good things, and Lazarus in like manner evil things; but now he is comforted here, and you are in anguish. And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been fixed, in order that those who would pass from here to you may not be able, and none may cross from there to us.’
And he said, ‘Then I beg you, father, to send him to my father’s house, for I have five brothers, so that he may warn them, lest they also come into this place of torment.’
But Abraham said, ‘They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them.’
And he said, ‘No, father Abraham; but if some one goes to them from the dead, they will repent.’
He said to him, ‘If they do not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they be convinced if some one should rise from the dead.’” (Luke 16:19–21)
Those who appeal to this account being a parable with a moral at the end, and not a real event, make much of the introductory words “There was a rich man” as being no one in particular, which is a common feature of Jesus’ parables. Moreover, they like to claim that this is really an allegory and not a representation of what occurs after death. The aim of the account according to them is to take heed of Moses and the prophets. The problem with this theory is the reader is left wondering why would Jesus go to the trouble of speaking about people receiving punishments and rewards after death if they did not exist.

Those who believe that this is a real account of an actual event that took place, of which Jesus was a witness, appeal to the use of the names. The rich man was given the name Dives. But the rich man was not given a name by Jesus in this account. Although, the story is known as Dives and Lazarus and The Rich Man and Lazarus.

For the account to have any validity, punishment and reward in the afterlife have to be real.
In which case, those who disregard what Moses had to say, will be experiencing a sorrow that is beyond the temporal sorrows of this world. However, as Abraham (who kept the Law of God—Genesis 26:5) tells the sorrowful man, who despised the beggar Lazarus when on Earth, unless people are willing to believe Moses (and acknowledge the Ten Commandments) they will scoff at the resurrection of the dead.

The two accounts regarding the two different individuals named Lazarus, speak about the resurrection of the dead.

The account in the Gospel of John is a real raising of a dead man that took place—only not unto eternal life as in the resurrection. This was a demonstration of the power of God so that the disciples would believe that the dead are raised and Jesus would be raised from the dead, because He could raise the dead.
The account in the Gospel of Luke, although told with some features of a parable, is really expressing a truth of what happens when people reject the Ten Commandments and think that faith, justice and mercy are of no consequence, because their is no judgment after death.

Only those who understand justice, who seek true justice, are able to appreciate life on this planet is not just about being born to experience suffering and then die. True justice requires vindication of existence and a purpose for being. Without such justice, everything people do is in vain, for there is no hope of anything being of eternal worth—therefore, worthwhile. Life itself becomes immoral and, as one beast eats another, one human consumes another—metaphorically, if not actually.

Fortunately, morality exists. We all know this is the case. But are we wise enough to recognize our insignificance and our need for a righteousness that transcends the corrupt variety known as self-righteousness?

The resurrection of Lazarus in the Gospel of John points to the power of God. The account in the Gospel of Luke points to the need to understand the Law of God and the consequences for those who despise it.


The Ten Commandments Were Designed For You To Enjoy And Possess Life

Saturday, October 21, 2017

MEN NEED WOMEN AND WOMEN NEED MEN BECAUSE TWO OF ONE WITHOUT THE OTHER MEANS DEATH FOR HUMANITY. Companionship Goes Beyond Just Cohabiting Together When It Comes To A Man And A Woman. Two men together and two women together are not going to procreate and neither is one of those combinations capable of reflecting the image of God.

The Bible teaches that God made man in His image. Both man and woman in a devoted relationship are required to be together for them to demonstrate the image of God in human form.
  • So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. (Genesis 1:27)
The Bible does talk about the first man, Adam, comparing him with the Second Adam, Lord Jesus Christ; but when one truly understands the purpose of God, this is a mute point; although, there are some important truths associated with this comparison of the two Adams.
  • Be subject to one another out of reverence for Christ. Wives, be subject to your husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. As the church is subject to Christ, so let wives also be subject in everything to their husbands. Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word, that he might present the church to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, that she might be holy and without blemish. Even so husbands should love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. For no man ever hates his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, as Christ does the church, because we are members of his body. “For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.” This mystery is a profound one, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church; however, let each one of you love his wife as himself, and let the wife see that she respects her husband. (Ephesians 5:21-33)
What we read in Ephesians is something that is not evident among societies today. Instead, of what God desires to see men and women do from a pure heart, we see everything else but this. In some societies, woman are subjugated and treated as third rate citizens. In other societies, women want to rule and even consider men unworthy of having any rights. Meanwhile, men and woman are promoting homosexuality and lesbianism and those who want to further drive a wedge into the family unit are promoting transgender and other distortions of what God originally deemed the ideal: a man and a woman loving one another and expressing that love as they inhabit and populate the Earth. What is written above by the Apostle Paul testifies to this.

The Ways Of The Disobedient Clearly Pathe The Way For Hatred Rather Than Love